Dr Abraham JESUDOSS

Medical practitioners tribunal – New Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Conviction / Caution
Hearing date from
01 Jun 2021
Hearing date to
03 Jun 2021
Location of hearing
This is a virtual hearing. It is possible to observe proceedings from our Manchester hearing centre. Please give us 14 days' notice if you would like to attend, so arrangements can be made. Contact us about observing a hearing
GMC reference number
6162765
Area of incident
Chelmsford

Pre hearing information

Allegation

The tribunal will inquire into the allegation that on 27 May 2020, at Chelmsford Magistrates’ Court, Dr Jesudoss was convicted of pursuing a course of conduct which amounted to the harassment of Ms A.

It is alleged that on 10 June 2020, Dr Jesudoss was sentenced to a community order requiring him to comply with the following by 9 June 2021: attend appointments as instructed by a responsible officer or participate in any activity as required by a responsible officer up to a maximum of 40 days and carry out 100 hours’ unpaid work under the supervision of a responsible officer. It is further alleged that Dr Jesudoss was sentenced to a restraining order lasting until 9 June 2021 prohibiting him from contacting Ms A directly or indirectly.

 

Allegations

This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.

Decisions

All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.

Journalists

If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.