Medical practitioners tribunal – New Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Misconduct, Performance
Hearing date from
18 Jan 2021
Hearing date to
29 Jan 2021
Location of hearing
This is a virtual hearing. It is possible to observe proceedings from our Manchester hearing centre. Please give us 14 days' notice if you would like to attend, so arrangements can be made. Contact us about observing this hearing
GMC reference number
Area of practice
Bristol, Somerset West and Taunton

Pre hearing information


The tribunal will inquire into the allegation that, in late 2016, Dr Hadi AlHassany, submitted a job application to University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust in which he failed to disclose his previous post at Musgrave Park Hospital. It is alleged that Dr Hadi AlHassany omitted his post because he knew that if an employment reference was requested it was likely to be unfavourable. It is alleged that his actions were dishonest.

It is further alleged that between 4 and 30 November 2018, Dr Hadi AlHassany underwent a General Medical Council assessment of the standard of his professional performance. It is alleged that his performance was unacceptable in the area of record keeping and a cause for concern in the areas of assessment and clinical management.



This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.


All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.


If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.