Dr Azubuike UDOYE

Medical practitioners tribunal – New Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Hearing date from
24 Jun 2019
Hearing date to
02 Jul 2019
Location of hearing
St James’s Buildings, 79 Oxford Street, Manchester, M1 6FQ (get directions)
GMC reference number
Area of practice

Pre hearing information


The tribunal will inquire into the allegation that Dr Udoye acted dishonestly when completing an application form for a ‘GP Induction & Refresher Scheme’.

It is also alleged that between 30 August 2017 and 16 March 2018 Dr Udoye undertook a placement, as part of the GP Induction & Refresher Scheme (‘the Placement’). Furthermore, that between 4 September 2017 and 26 February 2018 he practised as a General Practitioner whilst on the Placement when he knew that he was not eligible to do so as he was not on the GP Register and/or the National Medical Performers List. It is alleged that his actions were dishonest.
It is further alleged that between September 2017 and March 2018 Dr Udoye submitted ten claims to the National Recruitment Office in respect of the Placement for payment towards the cost of indemnity cover, his GMC Annual Retention Fee and monthly bursary payments when he was not eligible to make the claims. It is alleged his actions were dishonest.



This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.


All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.


If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.