Dr Ching LEUNG

Medical practitioners tribunal – New Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Misconduct
Hearing date from
11 Nov 2019
Hearing date to
20 Nov 2019
Location of hearing
St James’s Buildings, 79 Oxford Street, Manchester, M1 6FQ (get directions)
GMC reference number
7138489
Area of practice
City of London

Pre hearing information

Allegation

The tribunal will inquire into the allegation that, on a date in October 2016, Dr Leung arranged placements for two students from Hong Kong to attend King’s College Hospital (the Hospital), which was contrary to Hospital policy in that he organised the placements through Dr A’s secretary.

 

It is also alleged that on dates in December 2016, Dr Leung knowingly made untrue statements to Dr B regarding the clinical care that he had provided to Patients C and D. It is alleged that Dr Leung’s conduct in this regard was dishonest. It is further alleged that on 19 July 2017, Dr Leung consulted with Patient E and failed to provide good clinical care.

 

Finally, it is alleged that between 27 and 29 September 2017, Dr Leung allowed Dr F and Ms G, two non-members of hospital staff, to say overnight in the Consultants’ room at the Hospital where sensitive patient data was stored.

Allegations

This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.

Decisions

All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.

Journalists

If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.