Dr Christopher MATTOCK

Medical practitioners tribunal – New Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Misconduct
Hearing date from
22 Mar 2021
Hearing date to
06 Apr 2021
Location of hearing
St James’s Buildings, 79 Oxford Street, Manchester, M1 6FQ. It is possible to observe proceedings from our Manchester hearing centre. Please give us 14 days' notice if you would like to attend, so arrangements can be made. Contact us about observing a hearing
GMC reference number
2715249
Area of practice
Jersey

Pre hearing information

Allegation

The tribunal will inquire into the allegation that on 28 September 2017, in response to a complaint made against him, Dr Mattock created a retraction letter on behalf of a patient addressed to the Managing Director at Jersey General Hospital. The letter stated that the patient did not wish to pursue the complaint. Further, on 18 October 2017 during a consultation, it is alleged that Dr Mattock coerced the patient into signing the retraction letter, which was then sent by Dr Mattock with a covering letter to the Deputy Director of Operations at the Hospital. It is alleged that Dr Mattock knew that the information he had provided was untrue and that in doing so his actions were dishonest.

 

Allegations

This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.

Decisions

All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.

Journalists

If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.