Dr Dahlia ABDEL-RAZIK

Medical practitioners tribunal – New Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Misconduct
Hearing date from
10 Jun 2019
Hearing date to
14 Jun 2019
Location of hearing
St James’s Buildings, 79 Oxford Street, Manchester, M1 6FQ (get directions)
GMC reference number
4556505
Area of incident
Birmingham

Pre hearing information

Allegation

The tribunal will inquire into the allegation that Dr Abdel-Razik undertook locum shifts at two separate organisations whilst on paid sick leave during the periods between 8 September 2016 to on or around 12 October 2016 and between 8 May 2017 to on or around 23 July 2017. It is also alleged that Dr Abdel-Razik undertook locum shifts at an organisation whilst on a paid phased return to work during the period between on or around 6 August 2017 to 31 August 2017.

It is further alleged that Dr Abdel-Razik knew that she was not fit for work during the periods between 8 September 2016 to on or around 12 October 2016 and between 8 May 2017 to on or around 23 July 2017 and that she was on a phased return to work during the period between on or around 6 August 2017 to 31 August 2017.

It is alleged that Dr Abdel-Razik’s actions were dishonest.

 

Allegations

This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.

Decisions

All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.

Journalists

If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.