Medical practitioners tribunal – New Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Hearing date from
24 Jan 2022
Hearing date to
04 Feb 2022
Location of hearing
This is a virtual hearing. It is possible to observe proceedings from our Manchester hearing centre. Please give us 14 days' notice if you would like to attend, so arrangements can be made. Contact us about observing a hearing
Area of last practice

Pre hearing information


The Tribunal will inquire into an allegation that, on 20 November 2017, Dr Singh submitted an application to the GMC to restore his licence in which he did not disclose that the GMC had suspended him from the Medical Register on 16 April 2002.

It is further alleged that on 15 January 2019 Dr Singh submitted a National Performers’ List Application (‘NPL1’) in which he failed to disclose his suspension, previous removals from the List, and previous refusals to include him on the List. It is alleged that Dr Singh signed the declaration in the NLP1 in the knowledge that the information he had provided was untrue.

It is further alleged that in meetings held with Dr A, Dr Singh gave misleading information in relation to his suspension and the contents of the NPL1 form.

It is alleged that Dr Singh’s actions were dishonest.


This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.


All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.


If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.