Dr Haitham ALSHAFEY

Medical practitioners tribunal – New Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Misconduct
Hearing date from
13 Sep 2021
Hearing date to
24 Sep 2021
Location of hearing
St James’s Buildings, 79 Oxford Street, Manchester, M1 6FQ. It is possible to observe proceedings from our Manchester hearing centre. Please give us 14 days' notice if you would like to attend, so arrangements can be made. Contact us about observing a hearing
GMC reference number
6080315
Area of practice
Chichester

Pre hearing information

Allegation

The tribunal will inquire into the allegation that during preoperative consultations on 5 November 2018 and 11 December 2018, Dr Alshafey failed to provide good clinical care to Patient A. It is alleged that on 5 January 2019, Dr Alshafey failed to undertake the adequate training prior to performing an abdominoplasty combined with liposuction fat grafts on Patient A and failed to perform the appropriate assessments and checks. It is further alleged that on 15 January 2019, Dr Alshafey failed to provide adequate postoperative care to Patient A.

The tribunal will also inquire into the allegation that Dr Alshafey failed to provide good clinical care when performing a liposuction procedure on a patient.

 

Allegations

This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.

Decisions

All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.

Journalists

If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.