Dr Heike BOJAHR

Medical practitioners tribunal – New Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Conviction / Caution, Misconduct
Hearing date from
28 Jun 2021
Hearing date to
06 Jul 2021
Location of hearing
St James’s Buildings, 79 Oxford Street, Manchester, M1 6FQ, It is possible to observe proceedings from our Manchester hearing centre. Please give us 14 days' notice if you would like to attend, so arrangements can be made. Contact us about observing a hearing
GMC reference number
4233035
Area of practice
Tower Hamlets

Pre hearing information

Allegation

The tribunal will inquire into the allegation that, on one or more occasions between September and November 2018, at the Royal London Hospital, Dr Bojahr took medication belonging to Barts Health NHS Trust for personal use. It is further alleged that on 20 November 2018, Dr Bojahr dishonestly swapped a label on medication in order to facilitate removing the medication, putting patient safety at risk.

It is also alleged that on 15 May 2019, at East London Magistrates’ Court, Dr Bojahr was convicted of stealing medication belonging to Barts Health NHS Trust on 20 November 2018, with a value of £1.98. It is alleged that she was ordered by the Court to pay a fine of £1038.00.

Allegations

This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.

Decisions

All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.

Journalists

If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.