Dr Ibrahim RIZA

Medical practitioners tribunal – New Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Misconduct
Hearing date from
24 Jun 2019
Hearing date to
09 Jul 2019
Location of hearing
St James’s Buildings, 79 Oxford Street, Manchester, M1 6FQ (get directions)
GMC reference number
4308472
Area of practice
Oldham

Pre hearing information

Allegation

The tribunal will inquire into the allegation that between 16 December 2014 and 14 April 2015 Dr Riza advised Patient A to undergo an endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm using a Nellix device (‘the Procedure’). It is alleged that Dr Riza failed to adequately consider or inform Patient A of alternative treatment options; adequately consider advice about the unsuitability of the Procedure and keep adequate records.

It is further alleged that on 15 April 2015, prior to conducting the Procedure, Dr Riza failed to conduct an adequate pre-operative assessment and inform Patient A of alternative treatments. It is alleged that he also failed to keep adequate records.

In addition, it is alleged that Dr Riza failed to abandon the Procedure despite encountering various difficulties. Furthermore that, following the Procedure, Dr Riza failed to adequately communicate with Patient A and his family.

 

Allegations

This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.

Decisions

All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.

Journalists

If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.