Dr Idris Adekunle OKEWOLE

Medical practitioners tribunal – New Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Misconduct
Hearing date from
20 Feb 2020
Hearing date to
06 Mar 2020
Location of hearing
St James’s Buildings, 79 Oxford Street, Manchester, M1 6FQ (get directions)
GMC reference number
6130860
Area of practice
Stevenage, Milton Keynes

Pre hearing information

Allegation

The Tribunal will enquire into the allegation that, on 4 September 2017, Dr Okewole failed to adequately examine Patient A. It is further alleged that Dr Okewole initially plotted a measurement on Patient A’s growth chart without having carried out an adequate examination, and that his actions - in so doing - were dishonest.

The Tribunal will further enquire into the allegation that, on 17 November 2017, Dr Okewole carried out the removal of a left sided labial cyst (‘the Procedure’) on Patient B. It is alleged that he failed to obtain informed consent for the Procedure, failed to carry out an adequate pre-operative discussion, failed to examine Patient B before any form of anaesthetic was administered, inappropriately carried out the Procedure, failed to liaise with other members of the medical team, and failed to carry out an adequate post-operative discussion.

 

Allegations

This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.

Decisions

All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.

Journalists

If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.