Dr Jan VAN DER HOEK

Medical practitioners tribunal – New Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Misconduct
Hearing date from
19 Apr 2021
Hearing date to
19 Apr 2021
Details
Adjourned part-heard. Previously sat: 13-22 November 2019, 7-8 January, 16-17 January 2020, 1-11 & 26 March 2021. This hearing will also sit: 17-21 May 2021.
Location of hearing
This is a virtual hearing. It is possible to observe proceedings from our Manchester hearing centre. Please give us 14 days' notice if you would like to attend, so arrangements can be made. Contact us about observing a hearing
GMC reference number
3346154
Area of practice
Scarborough

Pre hearing information

Allegation

The tribunal will enquire into the allegation that, over the course of five consultations and two laser procedures that took place between September 2016 and April 2017, Dr Van Der Hoek failed to provide adequate care to Patient A. It is alleged that Dr Van Der Hoek failed to take an adequate history from Patient A, failed to perform adequate examinations, failed to refer Patient A for further assessments, failed to correspond appropriately with Patient A’s GP, failed to keep adequate records, and failed to obtain adequate consent.

 

Allegations

This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.

Decisions

All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.

Journalists

If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.