Dr Justine McINTYRE

Medical practitioners tribunal – New Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Misconduct
Hearing date from
11 Feb 2019
Hearing date to
19 Feb 2019
Location of hearing
St James’s Buildings, 79 Oxford Street, Manchester, M1 6FQ (get directions)
GMC reference number
7037071

Pre hearing information

Allegation

The tribunal will inquire into the allegation that in August 2017 Dr McIntrye made a written application to the GMC for full registration enclosing her curriculum vitae in which she falsely stated that she had a Postgraduate Diploma in Surgical Anatomy (PGDipSA), University of Otago 2011.

It is further alleged that in September 2017 Dr McIntyre provided the GMC with a Postgraduate Diploma Certificate in Surgical Anatomy purportedly from the University of Otago in which it stated that she had completed all four papers required for the Diploma, and that on or before 7 September 2017 she amended the original Certificate dated 29 April 2014 in which it was stated that she had completed three of the four papers required for the Diploma.

It is alleged that Dr McIntyre knew she had not achieved the Diploma at the time of submitting the documents and amending the original Certificate, and that her actions in this respect were dishonest.

Allegations

This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.

Decisions

All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.

Journalists

If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.