Medical practitioners tribunal – New Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Hearing date from
10 May 2021
Hearing date to
10 Jun 2021
Location of hearing
St James’s Buildings, 79 Oxford Street, Manchester, M1 6FQ. It is possible to observe proceedings from our Manchester hearing centre. Please give us 14 days' notice if you would like to attend, so arrangements can be made. Contact us about observing a hearing
GMC reference number
Area of practice
Portsmouth, Ipswich, Lewisham, Barrow-in-Furness, Dartford, Rotherham, Kensington and Chelsea, Tower Hamlets

Pre hearing information


The tribunal will inquire into the allegation that between 2014 and 2016, Dr Abusin submitted CVs to locum agencies and trusts which contained inaccurate information. It is alleged that his conduct was dishonest.
It is also alleged that on a number of occasions between 2000 and 2015, Dr Abusin removed patient confidential material from a number of trusts in breach of policies and guidelines.

It is further alleged that in October 2016, Dr Abusin failed to provide good clinical care to a patient. Finally, it is alleged that Dr Abusin breached conditions imposed on his registration by an Interim Orders Tribunal in July 2017 and that his conduct was dishonest.



This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.


All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.


If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.