Dr Khalid SHENDI

Medical practitioners tribunal – New Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Misconduct
Hearing date from
06 Jan 2020
Hearing date to
14 Jan 2020
Location of hearing
St James’s Buildings, 79 Oxford Street, Manchester, M1 6FQ (get directions)
GMC reference number
4324630
Area of practice
Ashfield

Pre hearing information

Allegation

The tribunal will inquire into the allegation that on 18 March 2016, when treating Patient A as an inpatient at the Hospital, Dr Shendi recorded in her medical notes that he had contacted the Consultant Urologist on call, Dr B, for advice on how to treat Patient A and was advised by Dr B to transfer Patient A to Derby Hospital for a nephrostomy. Furthermore, that Dr Shendi recorded in the medical notes that he had contacted a middle grade doctor, Dr C, at Derby Hospital; was advised by Dr C that he could not accept the case and Dr B should contact the Consultant Urologist in Derby Hospital directly. It is alleged that Dr Shendi’s conduct was dishonest as he had not contacted Dr B or Dr C.

It is further alleged that, on three occasions, Dr Shendi failed to return a Work Details Form within a reasonable amount of time when required to do so by the General Medical Council.

 

Allegations

This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.

Decisions

All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.

Journalists

If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.