Pre hearing information
The tribunal will inquire into the allegation that, on 16 June 2017, Dr Banerjee consulted with Patient B and failed to medicate the patient without delay. It is also alleged that she made retrospective entries in Patient B’s clinical records which did not accurately reflect her prescribing, were not marked as retrospective entries and were untrue.
It is alleged that on 17 July 2015, at her Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP) meeting, Dr Banerjee falsely claimed that she had not worked with any other Consultant Geriatricians who could provide a report on her clinical performance at the Royal Sussex County Hospital. It is alleged that at an ARCP meeting on 24 November 2015 Dr Banerjee falsely claimed that she had not worked under Consultant E’s supervision when she knew she had and knew that she had received negative feedback from Consultant E. It is also alleged that Dr Banerjee’s actions were dishonest.
It is further alleged that, during ARCP meetings on 24 November 2015 and 22 June 2016, Dr Banerjee’s communication with the Panel was inappropriate.
This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.
All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.
If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at email@example.com or call 0161 250 6868.
In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.