1. Home
  2. Hearings and decisions
  3. Medical practitioners tribunals
  4. Dr Mansoor BHATTI Apr 23

Dr Mansoor BHATTI

Medical practitioners tribunal – Remittal Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Hearing date from
03 Apr 2023
Hearing date to
14 Apr 2023
Location of hearing
St James’s Buildings, 79 Oxford Street, Manchester, M1 6FQ Contact us about observing a hearing
Area of practice

Pre hearing information


Following a remittal in full from the High Court, the tribunal will inquire into the allegation that, following a referral to the General Medical Council (GMC) by the General Dental Council (GDC) in respect of an alleged vexatious complaint Dr Bhatti made to the GDC, Dr Bhatti provided a copy of his medical records (the records) to the GMC which were intended to support the complaint he had made to the GDC. It is alleged that Dr Bhatti knew that the records were not an accurate copy as he had amended the records by adding entries in order to mislead the GMC into considering that his complaint to the GDC was valid. It is alleged that Dr Bhatti’s conduct in adding the entries was dishonest.

It is further alleged that Dr Bhatti had removed his date of birth and/or age from the records to cover up the fact that the date of birth in the records was different to the one that he had provided to the GMC.



This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.


All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.


If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.