Dr Miguel Jose NADAL

Medical practitioners tribunal – New Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Misconduct
Hearing date from
06 Sep 2021
Hearing date to
15 Oct 2021
Location of hearing
This is a virtual hearing. It is possible to observe proceedings from our Manchester hearing centre. Please give us 14 days' notice if you would like to attend, so arrangements can be made. Contact us about observing a hearing
GMC reference number
2593034
Area of practice
National

Pre hearing information

Allegation

The tribunal will inquire into the allegation that, between March 2016 and March 2018, Dr Nadal’s decision making in relation to the repatriation of Patients A, B and D was inadequate.

It is also alleged that from 5 July 2017 Dr Nadal’s care of Patient B was inadequate, and on 10 July 2017 his communication with Patient B’s family was inappropriate. It is further alleged that between 28 February and 4 March 2018, Dr Nadal’s care of patient D was inadequate, and on 28 February and 1 March 2018 his communication with Patient D’s family was inappropriate.

Finally, it is alleged that on 2 March 2018, Dr Nadal was condescending and unhelpful in his communication with Ms E, a Consulate Representative.

 

Allegations

This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.

Decisions

All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.

Journalists

If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.