1. Home
  2. Hearings and decisions
  3. Medical practitioners tribunals
  4. Dr Naveed RAZVI Dec 20

Dr Naveed RAZVI

Medical practitioners tribunal – New Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Misconduct
Hearing date from
08 Dec 2020
Hearing date to
21 Dec 2020
Location of hearing
This is a virtual hearing. It is possible to observe proceedings from our Manchester hearing centre. Please give us with 14 days' notice if you would like to attend, so arrangements can be made. Contact us about observing this hearing
GMC reference number
6076263
Area of practice
Ipswich

Pre hearing information

Allegation

The tribunal will enquire into the allegation that, on 3 August 2015, whilst working as the on-call Consultant Cardiologist at Ipswich Hospital, Dr Razvi provided telephone advice to Dr B in respect of Patient A to give IV Verapamil to Patient A when it was inappropriate to do so. The tribunal will also enquire into the allegation that Dr Razvi failed to attend the hospital to personally review and assess Patient A and manage Patient A’s treatment. It is further alleged that Dr Razvi failed to make a record of his discussion with Dr B, including his treatment recommendations and rationale.

 

Allegations

This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.

Decisions

All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.

Journalists

If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.