Medical practitioners tribunal – New Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Hearing date from
23 Sep 2019
Hearing date to
01 Oct 2019
Location of hearing
St James’s Buildings, 79 Oxford Street, Manchester, M1 6FQ (get directions)
GMC reference number
Area of incident

Pre hearing information


The tribunal will inquire into the allegation that whilst working as a locum consultant gastroenterologist, Dr Gbenoba completed an endoscopy request form dated 20 April 2018 for a patient and wrote that another doctor was the patient’s consultant. It is alleged that Dr Gbenoba did not inform the doctor that he had requested the endoscopy for the patient or that he had provided the doctor’s details as the named consultant on the form. It is also alleged that Dr Gbenoba knew he did not have permission to request the endoscopy for the patient.

The tribunal will also inquire into the allegation that Dr Gbenoba initiated the patient’s admissions to the day treatment unit for iron transfusions, named the same doctor as the treating consultant for the admissions and failed to inform the doctor of this.

On both of these occasions, it is alleged that Dr Gbenoba involved himself in the treatment of the patient, with whom he had a close personal relationship and deliberately failed to follow the overseas patient policy. It is alleged that Dr Gbenoba’s actions were dishonest.



This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.


All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.


If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.