Dr Rodney Ogaro Francis MOTINDI

Medical practitioners tribunal – New Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Conviction / Caution, Misconduct
Hearing date from
08 Jul 2019
Hearing date to
11 Jul 2019
Location of hearing
St James’s Buildings, 79 Oxford Street, Manchester, M1 6FQ (get directions)
GMC reference number
Area of practice

Pre hearing information


The tribunal will inquire into an allegation that on 25 June 2018 at Belfast Magistrates’ Court, Dr Motindi was convicted of driving a motor vehicle without being the holder of a driving licence authorising him to drive a motor vehicle of that class, contrary to Article 3(1) of the Road Traffic (Northern Ireland) Order 1981.

In addition, it is alleged that he was using a motor vehicle, on a road or other public place, without a Policy of Insurance or such a Security in respect of third-party risks, as required by Part V111 of the Road Traffic (Northern Ireland) Order 1981, contrary to Article 90(4) of the Road Traffic (Northern Ireland) Order 1981.

It is also alleged that on 25 June 2018 he was fined £185.00 and disqualified from driving for one week.

Further, it is alleged that Dr Motindi failed to notify the GMC without delay that he had been charged with a criminal offence resulting from his lack of driving license and motor insurance.



This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.


All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.


If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.