1. Home
  2. Hearings and decisions
  3. Medical practitioners tribunals
  4. Dr Sanjay CHATTERJEE Oct 24

Dr Sanjay CHATTERJEE

Medical practitioners tribunal – New Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Conviction / Caution, Misconduct
Hearing date from
21 Oct 2024
Hearing date to
18 Nov 2024
Location of hearing
4599111
Area of incident
Tonbridge and Malling, Sevenoaks

Pre hearing information

Allegation

The tribunal will inquire into the allegation that, on 5 May 2021, during a consultation with Patient A, Dr Chatterjee undertook an inappropriate vaginal examination and failed to obtain informed consent. It is alleged that Dr Chatterjee’s actions were sexually motivated. It is also alleged that Dr Chatterjee failed to obtain informed consent in respect of a rectal examination.

It is further alleged that, on 11 April 2017, at Sevenoaks Magistrates’ Court, Dr Chatterjee was convicted of failing without reasonable excuse to comply with notification requirements in respect of travel and failing to register a new passport. It is alleged that Dr Chatterjee was sentenced to 84 days’ imprisonment, suspended for 12 months and an Unpaid Work Requirement of 200 hours to be completed within 12 months.

Allegations

This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.

Decisions

All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.

Journalists

If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.