1. Home
  2. Hearings and decisions
  3. Medical practitioners tribunals
  4. Dr Sayed TALIBI Apr 24

Dr Sayed TALIBI

Medical practitioners tribunal – New Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Misconduct
Hearing date from
19 Nov 2024
Hearing date to
18 Dec 2024
Details
Adjourned part heard. Previously sat: 17 April-10 May 2024. Non-sitting day: 6 December 2024.
Location of hearing
7280771
Area of practice
Tamworth

Pre hearing information

Allegation

The tribunal will inquire into the allegation that, in May 2017, Dr Talibi received a banning order from a national supermarket after leaving without paying for an item. It is alleged that Dr Talibi’s actions were dishonest.

It is also alleged that during the period 2016 to 2017, Dr Talibi made racist and/or discriminatory statements about others, assaulted Ms A and behaved in a threatening, abusive and sexually motivated manner towards her, and in 2018 attempted to breach a Non-Molestation Order in relation to Ms A.

It is further alleged that between 2007 and 2017, Dr Talibi posed for photographs whilst in possession of what appeared to be offensive and/or prohibited weapons. It is alleged that Dr Talibi’s actions risked bringing the profession into disrepute.

 


Allegations

This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.

Decisions

All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.

Journalists

If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.