Dr Sheraz MAJEED

Medical practitioners tribunal – New Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Hearing date from
12 Nov 2021
Hearing date to
12 Nov 2021
Adjourned part-heard. Previously sat: 31 August - 7 September 2021. This hearing will also sit: 13-16 December 2021.
Location of hearing
St James’s Buildings, 79 Oxford Street, Manchester, M1 6FQ. It is possible to observe proceedings from our Manchester hearing centre. Please give us 14 days' notice if you would like to attend, so arrangements can be made. Contact us about observing a hearing
GMC reference number
Area of incident

Pre hearing information


The tribunal will inquire into the allegation that Dr Majeed on 27 August 2019, stated in a medico-legal report in respect of Patient A (‘the Report’) that he had carried out a musculoskeletal examination during a consultation with her on 18 August 2019 (‘the Consultation’), which he knew to be untrue, and his actions were dishonest.

It is further alleged that Dr Majeed failed to: maintain an adequate record of the Consultation; adequately document Patient A’s history; accurately document the information which Patient A provided to him during the consultation; and investigate whether Patient A’s symptoms could be attributed to her previous neck surgery.


This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.


All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.


If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.