Dr Tarek Hosny Wasim Mitwally SEDA

Medical practitioners tribunal – New Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Misconduct
Hearing date from
11 Dec 2019
Hearing date to
12 Dec 2019
Details
Hearing adjourned part heard. Hearing previously sat 22-26 July, 21 August 2019. This hearing will also sit 19 December 2019.
Location of hearing
St James’s Buildings, 79 Oxford Street, Manchester, M1 6FQ (get directions)
GMC reference number
6124507
Area of incident
Ashfield

Pre hearing information

Allegation

The tribunal will inquire into the allegation that between 27 June 2017 and 29 June 2017, whilst working night shifts in the emergency department of the King’s Mill Hospital, Dr Seda fell asleep whilst on duty, failed to inform anyone that he was going on a break and failed to adhere to his allocated break time.

It is further alleged that between 27 June 2017 and 29 June 2017, Dr Seda failed to provide good clinical care to three separate patients.

It is also alleged that Dr Seda was dishonest by failing to disclose restrictions on his practice to a locum agency and creating a false certificate of employment which he knew to be false.

By reason of the matters set out above, it is alleged that Dr Seda’s fitness to practise is impaired by reason of misconduct.

 

Allegations

This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.

Decisions

All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.

Journalists

If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.