1. Home
  2. Hearings and decisions
  3. Medical practitioners tribunals
  4. Dr Wequar AHMAD Aug 22

Dr Wequar AHMAD

Medical practitioners tribunal – New Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Misconduct, Determination of another regulator
Hearing date from
10 Aug 2022
Hearing date to
19 Aug 2022
Location of hearing
This is a virtual hearing. It is possible to observe proceedings from our Manchester hearing centre. Please give us 14 days' notice if you would like to attend, so arrangements can be made. Contact us about observing a hearing
5195979
Area of practice
Canada

Pre hearing information

Allegation

The tribunal will inquire into the allegation that between 20 March 2020 and 18 July 2020, Dr Ahmad completed three application forms and failed to confirm that he had undertaken a professional role in Alberta, Canada. It is alleged that he had knowingly failed to declare that he had been withdrawn from active practice whilst an investigation into his conduct was ongoing.

It is alleged that Dr Ahmad’s actions in completing the application forms were dishonest.

It is separately alleged that, following the investigation, on 27 April 2021, an overseas body in Canada determined that Dr Ahmad’s actions amounted to unprofessional conduct.

 

Allegations

This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.

Decisions

All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.

Journalists

If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.