Dr Callum METCALFE

The tribunal will inquire into the allegation that, on or around 2 January 2022, Dr Metcalfe attended a pharmacy and presented a prescription made out to Patient B whilst misrepresenting himself as Patient B. It is alleged that Dr Metcalfe intended to obtain the medication for his own use and that his conduct was dishonest.

It is further alleged that, on 21 September 2023, at Caernarforn Magistrates’ Court, Dr Metcalfe was convicted of being in charge of a motor vehicle whilst over the limit. It is alleged that Dr Metcalfe was disqualified from holding or obtaining a driving licence for 6 months and had his driving record endorsed.

We expect parts of this case to be heard in private.

Bydd y tribiwnlys yn ymchwilio i’r honiad bod Dr Metcalfe, ar 2 Ionawr 2022 neu tua’r adeg honno, wedi mynd i fferyllfa ac wedi cyflwyno presgripsiwn ar gyfer Claf B gan esgus mai ef oedd Claf B. Honnir bod Dr Metcalfe wedi bwriadu cael y feddyginiaeth at ei ddefnydd ei hun a bod ei ymddygiad yn anonest.

Honnir hefyd bod Dr Metcalfe, ar 21 Medi 2023 yn Llys Ynadon Caernarfon, wedi’i gael yn euog o fod yn gyfrifol am gerbyd modur pan oedd dros y terfyn alcohol cyfreithlon. Honnir bod Dr Metcalfe wedi'i wahardd rhag dal neu gael trwydded yrru am 6 mis a bod ei gofnod gyrru wedi cael ei ardystio.

Rydym yn disgwyl y gwrandewir ar rannau o’r achos hwn yn breifat.

This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.

All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.

If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.