Professor Justin Jack STEBBING

Medical practitioners tribunal – New Hearing scheduled
Outcome on impairment
Hearing not yet held
Summary of outcome
Hearing not yet held
Type of case
Misconduct
Hearing date from
25 Aug 2021
Hearing date to
12 Nov 2021
Details
Previously sat: 20 January -17 March, 14 September - 2 October, 30 November-17 December 2020, 13 - 15 January, 28 January - 12 March, 15 - 16 March, 12 - 16 April, 10 June & 21 June - 14 July 2021. Non-sitting days: 27 January, 10 - 12 & 16 - 17 March, 17 - 18 September, 22 September - 2 October, 3 - 17 December 2020, 12 February, 30 August & 11 - 15 October 2021.
Location of hearing
This is a virtual hearing. It is possible to observe proceedings from our Manchester hearing centre. Please give us 14 days' notice if you would like to attend, so arrangements can be made. Contact us about observing a hearing
GMC reference number
4211132
Area of practice
Kensington and Chelsea

Pre hearing information

Allegation

The tribunal will reconvene to enquire into the allegation that, between March 2014 and March 2017, Professor Stebbing failed to provide good clinical care to 11 patients.

The tribunal will also continue to enquire into the allegation that, on 15 March 2017, Professor Stebbing dishonestly signed off a BUPA application for funding a cancer drug/ regimen.

 

Allegations

This reflects the allegation as it stands at the start of the hearing. The allegation may be amended as the hearing proceeds and when findings of fact are made by the tribunal.

Decisions

All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.

Journalists

If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.

Private hearings

In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.