Dr Daman SHARMA
Doctor- Decision on impairment
- Hearing not yet held
- Outcome
- Hearing not yet held
- Type of case
- Misconduct
- Hearing start date
- 20 Feb 2025
- Hearing end date
- 20 Feb 2025
- Details
- Hearing adjourned part heard. Previously sat: 01 October - 22 November 2024 & 06 - 10 January 2025. Will also sit: 10-14 March & 06-09 May 2025 at St James’s Buildings, 79 Oxford Street, Manchester, M1 6FQ
- Hearing venue
- Virtual hearing Get directions to Virtual hearing for Dr Daman SHARMA's hearing. External link opens in a new tab.
- GMC reference number
- 6137845
- Area of practice
- Oldham, Liverpool
- Profession
- Doctor
Pre hearing information
- Allegation
The tribunal will continue to inquire into the allegation that, between October 2009 and September 2021, Dr Sharma behaved inappropriately towards six colleagues and two patients and that his conduct constituted harassment and was sexually motivated. It is also alleged that on or around 26 September 2021, Dr Sharma accessed the medical records of a colleague when he was not the treating clinician and had not received his colleague’s permission to do so.
It is further alleged that in 2016, Dr Sharma gave false information at a police interview and failed to inform his employer that he had been suspended from the National Performers List and that in 2018, Dr Sharma failed to inform a prospective employer that an order of conditions had been imposed on his registration. It is alleged that Dr Sharma’s conduct was dishonest.
- Decisions
- All decisions are published online within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.
- Journalists
- If you're a journalist and need up to date information about the allegation throughout the course of the hearing, please contact our press office at pressoffice@mpts-uk.org or call 0161 250 6868.
- Private hearings
- In accordance with Rule 41(2) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004, the tribunal may decide to exclude the public from the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, where they consider that the circumstances of the case outweigh the public interest in holding the hearing in public.