A12___14_Dr_Sharma___Circular.pdf_56843735

...as wrong (paragraph 31). HHJ Pelling then set out his reasoning to support this conclusion. To remind himself of Dr Sharma's case which was whilst the form was misleading, it was not intentionally so, because he had proceeded on the basis of a misunderstanding as to what was required. The Judge confirmed that the recipient of...

A16_14_Hussain___Circular.pdf_57043847

...ge doubted that reasonable and honest people would regard what Dr Hussain did as dishonest. He confirmed that it certainly was 'wrong, careless and regrettably misleading' but it was not dishonest. The rejection of Dr Hussain's version of events and finding that he was not a generally credible witness was not sufficient on it...

Guidance on redacting Records of determinations (RoDs)

...fficult balances here. As far as possible, decisions taken by a MPT and the reasons for them need to be clear from the public RoD. The public RoD should not be misleading - for example, by obscuring that a concern relates to a doctor's private life rather than their clinical practice. It is usually not possible therefore whol...

MPTS Committee meeting, 2 February 2022 (Agenda and Papers) - Publication

...1 General Medical Council The text of this document may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as GMC copyright and the document title specified. The GMC is a charity registered in England and Wales (1089278)...

A20_12_Nwogbo_Circular

... firstly that he had been charged and convicted of an offence of assault on his then wife, and secondly, that he was guilty of misconduct and that he had acted misleadingly and dishonestly by failing to notify relevant matters following on from that assault to various parties, specifically to the General Medical Council ("GMC...

A_08_13_Kumar_circular

...asonable efforts" as opposed to "all reasonable efforts" as set out in rule 31 it was arguable that if the passage was read as a whole it was not substantially misleading and further that even if there was a misdirection it could have made no difference as service by registered post did constitute "all reasonable efforts" sin...

05

Guidance for medical practitioners tribunals when considering what sanction to impose following an impairment finding and on issuing warnings where a tribunal concluded that the doctor’s fitness to practise is not impaired.

05. DC4198 Sanctions Guidance 18th November 2019

For use in new hearings that began on or after the 18 November 2019.

MPTS Committee - Agenda and papers for meeting on 14 September 2021

...facts and must not make unfair use of them. j If a registrant defends an allegation of primary fact by giving dishonest evidence and by deliberately seeking to mislead a tribunal then that conduct is relevant to consideration of impairment and fitness to practise in the future. However, if the registrant does no more than put...

MPTS Committee meeting - 8 February 2023, Agenda and Papers - Website

...tive component. If a registrant defends an allegation 51 www.mpts-uk.org 8 of primary concrete fact by giving dishonest evidence and by deliberately seeking to mislead the MPT then that forensic conduct would certainly say something about impairment and fitness to practise in the future. But if, at the other end of the scale,...