1. Home
  2. Parties and representatives
  3. Guidance for tribunals
  4. Tribunal guidance for doctors hearings
  5. Interim orders tribunal hearings
  6. Step 1 decide if the test for imposing an interim order is met
Interim orders tribunal hearings

Step 1: decide if the test for imposing an interim order is met

A text alternative is available for this image, follow the link "Text alternative: step 1: decide if the test for imposing an interim order is met"

Text alternative: step 1: decide if the test for imposing an interim order is met

Deciding if the test for imposing an interim order is met

  1. At an interim order tribunal (IOT) hearing, the IOT is not making findings of fact, resolving disputes of fact, or deciding whether the doctor’s fitness to practise is impaired. The role of the IOT is to consider the information referred to it and assess whether there is a risk arising from that information that means it’s necessary to take interim action on the doctor’s registration. 

  2. However, during an medical practitioners tribunal (MPT) hearing, the MPT may have already heard evidence or made factual findings at the point they are considering whether the test for imposing an interim order is met. The need for an interim order should be assessed by considering all relevant information, including information arising from the specific stage of the hearing that the case has reached. 

  3. When considering whether the test for imposing an interim order is met, the tribunal should consider any submissions received from the parties on the question of whether, given the circumstances of the case, it is necessary for the tribunal to impose an order. 

  4. Whether an interim order is needed will depend on the individual circumstances of the case and is a matter for the tribunal’s judgment. The tribunal should provide reasons for their decision, and in doing so explain how it relates to any submissions made by the parties.