Cookies

We use essential cookies to make this website work. We'd also like to use cookies to make improvements by seeing how you use the site. These cookies are only set if you accept them. Learn more about cookies we use.

Set preferences

Skip to content
Accessibility help

MPTS tribunal members

MPTS tribunal members

Hearings and decisions
Parties and representatives
Witnesses
- Witnesses Home
- Witness guide to hearings
About
- About Home
- How we work
- Our role
- Work with us
- Circulars
- Contact us
- Cymraeg

Home
Parties and representatives
Guidance for tribunals
Tribunal guidance for doctors hearings
Medical practitioners tribunal hearings
Process of decision making at an MPT review hearing

Medical practitioners tribunal hearings

Process of decision making at an MPT review hearing

full text alternative for this image can be found using link

Text alternative: process of decision making at an MPT review hearing

Previous Go to the previous page

Next Go to the next page

Back to main index

Medical practitioners tribunal hearings content

Section(s)

General introduction
Process of decision making at an MPT hearing
Part A: stage one - facts
Step 1: make findings of fact
Part B: stage two - impairment
Step 2: make a decision on impairment
- Deciding impairment
Step 2a: decide whether there is a legal basis for considering impairment
- The grounds of impairment
Step 2b: decide where on the spectrum of seriousness the allegation lies
Step 2c: consider the impact of any relevant context
- What is the impact of any relevant context known about the doctor and/or their working environment?
Step 2d: consider how the doctor has responded to the allegation(s)
Step 2e: on the basis of the conclusions reached in steps 2b, 2c and 2d decide if the doctor poses any current and ongoing risk to public protection and make a finding on impairment
- Deciding if the doctor poses any current and ongoing risk to public protection to reach a decision on impairment
Part C: stage three - sanction
Step 3: decide on sanction
Part D: decide if a warning is required
MPT review hearings
Process of decision making at an MPT review hearing
MPT review: stage one - impairment
Step 1: decide if the doctor's fitness to practise remains impaired
Step 1a: consider what has happened since the previous MPT's decision
Step 1b: make a finding on impairment
- Review hearings where there have also been new findings of fact   
MPT review : stage two - sanction
Step 2: decision on what action to take, if any

Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service

We are the tribunal service for doctors, physician associates (PAs) and anaesthesia associates (AAs). We run hearings that make independent decisions about whether doctors, PAs and AAs are fit to practise in the UK.

Hearings and decisions
Parties and representatives
Witnesses
About

MPTS tribunal members
News
Contact us
Cymraeg

© Copyright Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service and General Medical Council 2026.
All rights reserved

Accessibility
Freedom of information
Privacy and cookies
Disclaimer
Sitemap